Caroline Birds College Is a Waste of Time and Money Essay -- Universi

In her term College Is a Waste of Time and Money, Caroline hushing attempts to pursued her readers that colleges argon overflowing with students who dont belong there. Her article first appeared in Psychology Today (May 1975). Since this material is outdated, I contract it hard to believe that most of the responses by students and parents quoted in the article in time h oldish true. The author has set out to pursue the readers that college is a severely and unnecessary survival of the fittest for todays youth. Yet the author holds a bachelors and a master degree from twain different universities. I would specify that if she thought college was really a bad choice and a molder of time and funds, she would not have gone back to get her masters degree. I am a college student myself and there were only two things in the whole article that I was in agreement with. mavin was that colleges try to market themselves. The other was her paragraph on how Americans are facial expressi on less and less for great paying jobs and are looking more than for job that they like doing. This unfortunately is also a contradiction to her tour of writing, because college prepares, and helps you get a job that you will enjoy. Furthermore, the authors important ideas were not well thought out or well supported. An caseful of this might be her gold investment idea. She implies that if an eighteen year old invested his/hers college tuition money in a bank, and kept it there bank he/she was sixty-four, they would be twice as rich as those who go to school, graduate and playact in their field of study. What she fails to mention is that while their money is gathering interest, it can not be touched till their sixty-four, and in the mean time they have to be making a nutrition in another job which they probably hate doing. Overall, Birds attempt to pursue her readers that college is a waste of time did not work on me.Students are in colleges because they are told to, or beca use they still postulate to be financially depend on their parents and not have to chafe about growing up to face the real world. The author in her article writes such ideas. Furthermore, since colleges became a big industry in the 60s, and now the number of people attending has fallen, colleges use marketing skills to learn more students in. They try to make college sound as easy as possible to make more people register. Students, once in college are not happy and drop out,... ...hat parents want a better and easier stylus of life for their kids. My parents send me to college so that I could make more money doing an easier job than they have to do, because they lack a college diploma. She feels that eighteen-year-olds should make their receive choice whether to go to college or not. I think that when a person is eighteen, they are too young to make their own decisions. I know this from my own experience. If I had a freedom of choice when I was eighteen, I would not be writing this critique, because I would not be in college. simply now that I have grown up and did some thought process I want to stay and get my degree. I feel that kids should at least try college, learn and see a couple of things and thus decide whether they should stay or go. Generally, parents without a college education are the ones who gift the most emphasis on their kids going to college and making something of themselves, in gear up to have a better life thusly(prenominal) they had. The author then goes on to challenge her own ideas by saying that college does prepare you for a job that you actually might like doing, and that is what most Americans want. So then would not college be a good choice for most Americans?