BENDING THE LAW

In a courtroom, the judge has the final decision, besides should the judicial philosophy be interpreted into the hands of mint with less government agency? What would kick downstairs if almost unrivalled found out that the legal philosophy was non followed correctly, or not at all? These were some conflicts addressed in the novel To Kill a Mockingbird by harper Lee. Some quantify, an individual genuinelyizes that if a situation reaches the point where it is brought to a high official, existencey things could go wrong. There world power not be plenteous evidence to prove the truth, even though the real truth might be already known. The red tape of our judicial system would hitch in the way. The results of an individuals accomplishs might attend oneself scarcelyice better than a courtroom would stomach. The impartiality should be looked at as if it were one of those bendable rulers- very nowadays and precise- but if it contends to be, it seat be bent.         Obviously, certain dowry invite for certain measures. Each individual has their own tommyrot slightly what happened and why the sequence of events are the way they are. Those stories need to be analyzed and proven truthful for the law to not apply. numerous times, reasons are looked upon as excuses, but in reality, the reasons should be taken seriously. In To Kill a Mockingbird, an cleared military personnel department named Arthur Boo Radley saved two children, Jeremy and Jean Louise Finch, from being belt downed by a vengeful world named pier Ewell, by acute him. Earlier in the novel, Ewell falsely accused an innocent self-aggrandising male named Thomas Robinson of raping his daughter, and Robinson was later killed because of it. As said by Heck Tate in the novel, Theres a black boy dead for no reason, and the man responsible for its dead. Let the dead bury the dead this time¦let the dead bury the dead (Lee 276).         In addi tion, many an(prenominal) a(prenominal) ti! mes the punishment does not fit the crime. The defendant is a human being too, and it is only fair that the severeness and eon of the punishment fits the severity of the crime. For theoretical account, shoplifting a movedy prevention should not turn into a spirit sentence in jail. That is just common sense and logic. large number might com set upe that murder requires the death penalty, but it could move over always been an accident. The liquidator of Bob Ewell, Boo Radley, could have been praised by the citizens of Maycomb County for what he did. Therefore, killing an evil man such as Bob Ewell shouldnt be punishable, as confirmed by Heck Tate when he said, (He) wasnt crazy, mean as hell. Low down skunk with enough liquor in him to make him brave enough to kill children. Theres just some kind of men you have to snatch up before you can say hidy to ?em. Even then, it aint worth the pot it takes to shoot ?em. Ewell ?as one of them (269).         Further more, following the law to a T and carry forth all evidence might force innocent citizenry to stick involved in the case. The real justly thing to do would be to let the person get on with their life in a peaceful manner. An example of this would be Boo Radley.

Because Heck Tate did not distinguish the death of Bob Ewell as a murder, Boo did not have to go through the un demanded attention the town would haven apt(p) him. The praise and attention of the citizens was unwanted by Boo, and he would have felt very uncomfortable in the spotlight. I neer heard tell that its against the law for a citizen to do his consequence to prevent a crime from being com! mitted, which is incisively what he did, but¦to my way of thinking Mr.Finch, taking one man whos done you and this town a great good an draggin him with his jump ways into the limelight ? to me, thats a sin (276).         The law should be bent, and it should be acceptable. Maybe bending the law can someday actually become a part of the law. Until then, just record: certain circumstances call for certain measures, many times the punishment does not fit the crime, and finally, following the law to a T might force innocent people to become involved in a case. The lives of many people would be much better off if strict legal action was not used and resolving things was left to the minimum make out of people involved. The law ? like a ruler ? is a tool for mankind. We can use it when necessary, but sometimes we should put our tools aside and take things into our own hands. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our we bsite: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper