Elizabeth Poor Laws

The Last Years of the unfortunate police force During the interwar period the scant(p) righteousness served as a symmetricalness safety net, assisting those who fell through the cracks of the existing social insurance policies. The naughty unemployment of 1921-38 led to a sharp increase in sums on relief. The official count of relief recipients rose from 748,000 in 1914 to 1,449,000 in 1922 the number relieved averaged 1,379,800 from 1922 to 1938. A large share of those on relief were lazy workers and their dependents, especi every last(predicate)y in 1922-26.Despite the extension of unemployment insurance in 1920 to virtually all workers except the self-employed and those in agriculture or domestic service, in that respect still were large numbers who either did not qualify for unemployment benefits or who had exhausted their benefits, and many of them turned to the ridiculous natural law for assistance. The vast volume were given outdoor relief from 1921 to 1923 the num ber of outdoor relief recipients increase by 1,051,000 while the number receiving indoor relieve increased by 21,000. The unequal Law becomes redundant and is repealedDespite the outstanding role played by suffering relief during the interwar period, the goernment continued to adopt policies, which bypassed the Poor Law and left it to die by attrition and surgical removals of essential organs (Lees 1998). The Local Government Act of 1929 abolished the Poor Law unions, and transferred the administration of poor relief to the counties and county boroughs. In 1934 the responsibility for assisting those unemployed who were outside the unemployment insurance establishment was transferred from the Poor Law to the Unemployment Assistance Board.Finally, from 1945 to 1948, Parliament adopted a series of laws that together formed the basis for the wellbeing articulate, and made the Poor Law redundant. The National Assistance Act of 1948 officially repealed all existing Poor Law legisla tion, and replaced the Poor Law with the National Assistance Board to phone number as a residual relief agency. In what way mightiness the legacy of the 1834, poor Law be seen in coetaneous offbeat policy? This essay will endeavour to highlight the advantages/disadvantages, and how the welfare body politic treats individual members of the community differently .The historically changing conceptualization of the welfare state and its provision of social services the individuals democratic right to entre the state provided benefits, are looked at in their historically and geographically changing existing structure. Conflicting conservative, liberal and socialist methods to the view of individual vs. corporate responsibility are considered in the context of rival welfare state arrangements. The Poor Law was established and put into motion in 1601 during the judgment of conviction of Elizabeth I. The aims of the poor law, according to Golding and Middleton were work, disciplin e, deterrence and classification.The poor law was the most important policy development dealing with penury up until the end of the 19th century and it was a development, which main(prenominal) objective was upon control and deterrence. The Poor Law of 1601 lasted for over two centuries, but it was inefficient. Governments did not hurt the control, means or organisation to deal with poverty effectively. Poverty was a regional and study problem, and yet each local parish was left to deal with it individually The Poor Law cannot be seen just as a vehicle use to preserve life of those who could not feed, clothe or house themselves.Rather it should be seen as a part of the social response of a nightspot that was moving from a wholly agricultural and village based clubhouse towards an industrialised and largely urban society. What is the legacy?. the welfare state of to daytime with social benefits for all and free medical help also command no one needs to starve in Britain. T he idears of the older poor laws can be seen in to days welfare state as an extension of these poor laws through more recent governments.. (2011, 01).In What Way qualification the Legacy of the 1834, Poor Law Be Seen in Contemporary public assistance Policy?. StudyMode. com. Retrieved 01, 2011, from http//www. studymode. com/essays/In-What-Way-Might-The-Legacy-549882. html Modern welfare state development is by and large considered to mavin to social security or benefits payments, social housing provision, health provision, social work and educational services. Together these services are know as the big five but these services tend to develop over time and have differed in quantity, availability and quality.Provision and development can permute due to social, economic and political factors (Spicker, 1995, p. 3). State provision of welfare has a long history, in Britain for instance dating back to the Elizabethan Poor Laws and earlier. well-being states started to develop whe n surveys of poverty by people such as Charles Booth showed the inadequacy of welfare provisions that could not deal with poverty particularly with increasing urbanisation and industrialisation (Thane, 1996, p. 7). The worldwide depression from 1929 would lead countries to consider further welfare developments.High unemployment (12% of the working population in Britain at its worst) showed that better welfare provision was needed (Robbins, 1994, p. 208). From such modest grow the public sector in Britain for example represents around 40 % of the miserliness (Simpson, 2005, p. 4). There are various key theories that seek to explain the processes knotted in welfare state development that will be explained below. The theories have evolved or being devised to explain the differences and similarities in welfare state development in different countries at the same time or in a single country over a period of time.Theories suss out that welfare states were developed to serve those that needed help the most or sometimes as universal services to all (OBrien and Penna, 1998, p. 2). After the main theories have been discussed the one or ones that are most applicable for evaluating contemporary changes will be outlined. There are different ways of flavor at the development of the welfare state and deciding how far it should extend, demands. (2013, 01). Welfare State. StudyMode. com. Retrieved 01, 2013, from http//www. studymode. com/essays/Welfare-State-1342080. html