Location Planning and Analysis Essay

Every unbendable moldiness(prenominal) use stance planning techniques. There atomic number 18 many options for mess planning. Corporations choose from expanding an animate localisation principle, shutting down angiotensin-converting enzyme side and moving to another, adding new fixtures eon retaining breathing facilities, or doing nothing. There ar a variety of methods utilise to decide the best hole or alternatives for the corporation. bodys such as seeing the country, prevalent region, sm all told number of comm building blocky alternatives, and site alternatives.Several fixingss that crook location positioning include the location of dim materials, proximity to the marketplace, climate, and culture. Models for evaluating whether a location is best for an fundamental law consist of terms-profit analysis for locations, the center of sobriety model, the emigration model, and factor rating.This chapter discusses the decision to re fall a facility by consid ering be and benefits. If you argon planning on moving or acquiring a new facility, there be many factors to consider the size, the geographic argona, culture, transferral monetary value and others. After a location or locations pee been elect a equal-profit-volume analysis is done.The main factors that affect location decisions include regional factors, community considerations, and site-related factors. Community factors consist of quality of life, services, attitudes, taxes, environmental regulations, utilities, and development support.EVALUATING billet ALTERNATIVES (Page 385) There are three specific analytical techniques available to economic aid in evaluating location alternatives1. Location Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis1. The Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis preempt be represented either mathematically or graphically. It involves three steps 1) For for individually one location alternative, determine the fixed and variable be, 2) For all locations, plot the occur-c ost places on the same graph, and 3) Use the lines to determine which alternatives result nourish the highest and lowest total cost for expected levels of widening. Additionally, there are quaternity assumptions one must keep in mind when using this method1. Fixed costs are constant.2. Variable costs are elongated.3. Required level of railroad siding can be closely estimated.4. There is only one output involved.5.2. Total cost = FC = v(Q) where FC=Fixed Cost, v=Variable Cost per Unit, Q= itemize of Units (Also shown below simply not in the same format) 1. Factor pass judgment1. This method involves qualitative and quantitative inputs, and evaluates alternatives based on comparison afterward(prenominal) establishing a composite value for each alternative. Factor Rating consists of hexad steps 1. retard relevant and chief(prenominal) factors. 2. Assign a tip to each factor, with all weights totaling 1.00. 3. Determine common scale for all factors, usually 0 to 100. 4 . Score each alternative. 5. Adjust score using weights (multiply factor weight by score factor) add up scores for each alternative. 6. The alternative with the highest score is considered the best option. 2. Minimum scores may be established to set a particular standard, though this is not necessary. 2. marrow squash of Gravity Method1. This technique is used in determining the location of a facility which will either reduce travel conviction or lower shipping costs. Distri onlyion cost is seen as a linear function of the distance and quantity shipped. The Center of Gravity Method involves the use of a visual map and a coordinate system the coordinate points being treated as the set of numerical determine when calculating averages. If the quantities shipped to each location are equal , the center of gravity is found by taking the averages of the x and ycoordinates if the quantities shipped to each location are disparate , a weighted average must be apply (the weights being t he quantities shipped). Company RelocatingThere are many factors that contribute to a friendship relocating. Some of the reasons include expanding the market and diminishing resources. For an existing familiarity to relocate, they must weigh their options when planning to relocate elsewhere. They can expand their existing facility, add new ones and keep their existing facilities open, move to another location and shut down one location, or keep things the expression they are and not do anything. Globalization has led many companies to set up operations in other countries. Two factors that make relocation appeal are advances in technology and trade agreements. By going global, companies will expand their markets and be able to cut costs in labor, transportation, and taxes. They withal have gained ideas for new merchandises and services.IDENTIFYING A COUNTRY, REGION, COMMUNITY, AND come in (Page 376) factors that influence location decisions areManufacturing o Availability of e nergy and watero Proximity to raw materialso Transportation costServiceo Traffic patternso Proximity to marketso Location of competitorsOnce important factors have been determined, an organization will narrow down alternatives to a specific geographic region. These factors that influence location selection are often diverse depending on whether the firm is a manufacturing or service firm. When deciding on a location, mangers must bow into account the culture shock employees might face after a location move. Culture shock can have a big impact on employees which might affect workers productivity, so it is important that mangers look at this.v IDENTIFYING A COUNTRYo A decision maker must understand the benefits and risks as well as the probabilities of them occurringv IDENTIFYING A REGION- 4 major considerationso Location to in the altogether Materials The three most important reasons for a firm to locate in a particular region includes raw materials, perishability, and transportat ion cost. This often depends on what business the firm is in. o Location to Markets Profit maximizing firms locate near markets that they want to serve as part of their competitive strategy. A Geographic information system(GIS) is a computer based tools for collecting, storing, retrieving, and displaying demographic entropy on maps. o Labor Factors Primary considerations include labor availability, profits rates, productivity, attitudes towards work, and the impact unions may have. o Other Climate is sometimes a consideration because bad weather can disrupt operations. Taxes are in any case an important factor collect to the fact that taxes affect the bottom line in some financial statements.v IDENTIFYING A COMMUNITYo There are many important factors for deciding upon the community in which move a business. They include facilities for education, shopping, recreation and transportation among many others. From a business standpoint these factors include utilities, taxes, and env ironmental regulation.v IDENTIFYING A SITEo The main considerations in choosing a site are land, transportation, zone and many others. When identifying a site Iit is important to consider to see if the association plans on growing at this location. If so, the firm must consider whether or not location is satisfactory for expansion. There are many decisions that go into choosing exactly where a firm will establish its operations. First, a play along must determine the driving factors that will influence which areas are suitable locations.After these factors have been determined, the corporation will identify potential countries and hear the pros and cons of establishing operations in these countries. After looking at pro and cons of the divergent countries and deciding on a country, then decision makers will identify a region within the country. When identifying a region, decision makers must take for the four major factors explained above into consideration. The last two stag es of the search include choosing a community and a site.Note The above part is way too lengthy for this assignment. Summary below..Summary There are several(prenominal) ways that are very helpful in evaluating location alternatives, such as locational cost-profit-volume analysis, factor rating, and the center of gravity method. First, lets take a look at Location Cost-Profit-Volume Analysis.This analysis can be done numerically or graphically. The procedure for locational cost-profit-volume analysis involves these steps1. Determine the fixed and variable costs associated with each location alternative. 2. Plot the total-cost lines for all location alternatives on the same graph. 3. Determine which location will have the lowest total cost for the expected level of output. Alternatively, determine which location will have the highest profit.This method assumes the following1. Fixed costs are constant for the range of probable output.2. Variable costs are linear for the range of prob able output.3. The required level of output can be closely estimated.4. Only one product is involved.Herere a couple of important formulas to rememberTotal cost = Fixed cost + Variable cost per unit * Quantity or volume of output Total profit = Quantity(Revenue per unit Variable cost per unit) Fixed costIn most situations, other factors besides cost must besides be considered. Wewill now consider another kind of cost often considered in location decisions transportation costs.Transportation costs sometimes play an important role in location decisions. The company can include the transportation costs in a locational cost-volume analysis by incorporating the transportation cost per unit being shipped into the variable cost per unit if a facility will be the sole source or destination of shipments. When there is a problem with shipment of goods from multiple displace points to multiple receiving points, and a new location is to be added to the system, the company should abbreviate a separate analysis of transportation. In this case, transportation model of linear programming is very helpful. The model is used to analyze each of the configurations considered, and it reveals the minumum costs each would provide. Then the information can be included in the evaluation of location alternatives.Multiple Plant Manufacturing Strategies (page 381-382)-When comapnies have several manufacturing facilities t here are several polar ways for a company to organize their operations. These ways include assigning different product lines to different plants, assigning different market areas to different plants, or assigning different processes to different plants. These strategies carry their own cost and managerial implications, but they as well as carry a certain competitive advantage. There are four different types of plant strategies1. Product Plant Strategy* Products or product lines are produced in separate plants, and each plant is usually responsible for supplying t he entire domestic market. * It is a decentralized approach as each plant focuses on a narrow set of requirements that includes long suit of labor, materials, and equipment along product lines. * Specialization involved in this strategy usually results in economies of scale and, compared to multipurpose plants, lower operating costs. * The plant locations may either be widely scattered or placed relatively close to one another.2. Market Area Plant Strategy* Here, plants are designed to serve a particular geographic segment of a market. * The individual plants can produce either most, or all of the companys products and supply a limited geographical area. * The operating costs of this strategy are often times higher than those of product plants, but savings on shipping costs for comparable products can be made. * This strategy is useful when shipping costs are high due to volume, weight, or other factors. * It can also bring the added benefits of faster actors line and retort tim es to local needs. * It requires a centralized coordination of decisions to add or delete plants, or to expand or downsize current plants because of changing market conditions.3. Process Plant Strategy* Here, different plants concentrate on different aspects of a process. * This strategy is most useful when products have numerous components separating the return of components results in less confusion than if all the production were done in the same location. * A major issue with this strategy is the coordination of production end-to-end the system, and it requires a highly informed, centralized administration in order to be an effective operation. * It can bring about additional shipping costs, but a key benefit is that individual plants are highly specialized and generate volumes that brings economies of scale.4. General-Purpose Plant StrategyPlants are flexible and have the ability to handle a range of products * It allows for a quick response to products and market changes, b ut can be less productive than a more focused approach. * A benefit to this approach is the increase in learning opportunities that happens when similar operations are being done in different plants. Solutions to problems as well as improvements made at one plant can be shared with the other plants